0.07/0.16 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.07/0.17 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bYDriiB9MJ true 0.14/0.38 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu 0.14/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.14/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.14/0.38 % CPULimit : 960 0.14/0.38 % WCLimit : 120 0.14/0.38 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 05:16:54 EDT 2022 0.14/0.39 % CPUTime : 0.14/0.39 % Running portfolio for 960 s 0.14/0.39 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.14/0.39 % Number of cores: 8 0.14/0.39 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.14/0.39 % Running in HO mode 0.60/0.72 % Total configuration time : 828 0.60/0.72 % Estimated wc time : 1656 0.60/0.72 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0 0.61/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s 0.61/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s 0.61/0.84 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s 0.61/0.84 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s 0.61/0.84 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s 0.61/0.85 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s 0.61/0.85 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s 0.61/0.85 % Solved by lams/35_full_unif4.sh. 0.61/0.85 % done 4 iterations in 0.012s 0.61/0.85 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 0.61/0.85 % SZS output start Refutation 0.61/0.85 thf(union_type, type, union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.61/0.85 thf(intersection_type, type, intersection: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.61/0.85 thf('#sk1_type', type, '#sk1': $i > $o). 0.61/0.85 thf('#sk3_type', type, '#sk3': $i > $o). 0.61/0.85 thf('#sk4_type', type, '#sk4': $i). 0.61/0.85 thf('#sk2_type', type, '#sk2': $i > $o). 0.61/0.85 thf(intersection, axiom,(( intersection ) = 0.61/0.85 (^[X:( $i > $o ),Y:( $i > $o ),U:$i]: ( ( X @ U ) & ( Y @ U ) )))). 0.61/0.85 thf('0', plain, 0.61/0.85 (( intersection ) = 0.61/0.85 ( ^[X:( $i > $o ),Y:( $i > $o ),U:$i]: ( ( X @ U ) & ( Y @ U ) ) )), 0.61/0.85 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [intersection])). 0.61/0.85 thf('1', plain, 0.61/0.85 (( intersection ) = 0.61/0.85 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o ),V_3:$i]: 0.61/0.85 ( ( V_1 @ V_3 ) & ( V_2 @ V_3 ) ) )), 0.61/0.85 define([status(thm)])). 0.61/0.85 thf(union, axiom,(( union ) = 0.61/0.85 (^[X:( $i > $o ),Y:( $i > $o ),U:$i]: ( ( X @ U ) | ( Y @ U ) )))). 0.61/0.85 thf('2', plain, 0.61/0.85 (( union ) = 0.61/0.85 ( ^[X:( $i > $o ),Y:( $i > $o ),U:$i]: ( ( X @ U ) | ( Y @ U ) ) )), 0.61/0.85 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [union])). 0.61/0.85 thf('3', plain, 0.61/0.85 (( union ) = 0.61/0.85 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o ),V_3:$i]: 0.61/0.85 ( ( V_1 @ V_3 ) | ( V_2 @ V_3 ) ) )), 0.61/0.85 define([status(thm)])). 0.61/0.85 thf(union_distributes_over_intersection, conjecture, 0.61/0.85 (![A:( $i > $o ),B:( $i > $o ),C:( $i > $o )]: 0.61/0.85 ( ( union @ A @ ( intersection @ B @ C ) ) = 0.61/0.85 ( intersection @ ( union @ A @ B ) @ ( union @ A @ C ) ) ))). 0.61/0.85 thf(zf_stmt_0, conjecture, 0.61/0.85 (![X4:( $i > $o ),X6:( $i > $o ),X8:( $i > $o )]: 0.61/0.85 ( ( ^[V_1:$i]: ( ( ( X8 @ V_1 ) & ( X6 @ V_1 ) ) | ( X4 @ V_1 ) ) ) = 0.61/0.85 ( ^[V_2:$i]: 0.61/0.85 ( ( ( X8 @ V_2 ) | ( X4 @ V_2 ) ) & ( ( X6 @ V_2 ) | ( X4 @ V_2 ) ) ) ) ))). 0.61/0.85 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture, 0.61/0.85 (~( ![X4:( $i > $o ),X6:( $i > $o ),X8:( $i > $o )]: 0.61/0.85 ( ( ^[V_1:$i]: ( ( ( X8 @ V_1 ) & ( X6 @ V_1 ) ) | ( X4 @ V_1 ) ) ) = 0.61/0.85 ( ^[V_2:$i]: 0.61/0.85 ( ( ( X8 @ V_2 ) | ( X4 @ V_2 ) ) & ( ( X6 @ V_2 ) | ( X4 @ V_2 ) ) ) ) ) )), 0.61/0.85 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 0.61/0.85 (~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: 0.61/0.85 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i > $o]: 0.61/0.85 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : $i > $o]: 0.61/0.85 ((((^[Y3 : $i]: 0.61/0.85 (((((Y2 @ Y3) & (Y1 @ Y3))) | 0.61/0.85 (Y0 @ Y3))))) = 0.61/0.85 ((^[Y3 : $i]: 0.61/0.85 (((((Y2 @ Y3) | (Y0 @ Y3))) & 0.61/0.85 (((Y1 @ Y3) | (Y0 @ Y3))))))))))))))))))), 0.61/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, 0.61/0.85 (~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: 0.61/0.85 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i > $o]: 0.61/0.85 ((((^[Y2 : $i]: 0.61/0.85 (((((Y1 @ Y2) & (Y0 @ Y2))) | ('#sk1' @ 0.61/0.85 Y2))))) = 0.61/0.85 ((^[Y2 : $i]: 0.61/0.85 (((((Y1 @ Y2) | ('#sk1' @ Y2))) & 0.61/0.85 (((Y0 @ Y2) | ('#sk1' @ Y2)))))))))))))))), 0.61/0.85 inference('lazy_cnf_exists', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain, 0.61/0.85 (~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: 0.61/0.85 ((((^[Y1 : $i]: 0.61/0.85 (((((Y0 @ Y1) & ('#sk2' @ Y1))) | ('#sk1' @ Y1))))) = 0.61/0.85 ((^[Y1 : $i]: 0.61/0.85 (((((Y0 @ Y1) | ('#sk1' @ Y1))) & 0.61/0.85 ((('#sk2' @ Y1) | ('#sk1' @ Y1))))))))))))), 0.61/0.85 inference('lazy_cnf_exists', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, 0.61/0.85 (~ ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ((((('#sk3' @ Y0) & ('#sk2' @ Y0))) | ('#sk1' @ Y0))))) = 0.61/0.85 ((^[Y0 : $i]: 0.61/0.85 ((((('#sk3' @ Y0) | ('#sk1' @ Y0))) & 0.61/0.85 ((('#sk2' @ Y0) | ('#sk1' @ Y0)))))))))), 0.61/0.85 inference('lazy_cnf_exists', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, 0.61/0.85 ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ((((('#sk3' @ Y0) & ('#sk2' @ Y0))) | ('#sk1' @ Y0))))) 0.61/0.85 != ((^[Y0 : $i]: 0.61/0.85 ((((('#sk3' @ Y0) | ('#sk1' @ Y0))) & 0.61/0.85 ((('#sk2' @ Y0) | ('#sk1' @ Y0))))))))), 0.61/0.85 inference('simplify nested equalities', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, 0.61/0.85 ((((((('#sk3' @ '#sk4') & ('#sk2' @ '#sk4'))) | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4'))) 0.61/0.85 != ((((('#sk3' @ '#sk4') | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4'))) & 0.61/0.85 ((('#sk2' @ '#sk4') | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4'))))))), 0.61/0.85 inference('neg_ext', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, 0.61/0.85 ((((((('#sk3' @ '#sk4') & ('#sk2' @ '#sk4'))) | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4'))) 0.61/0.85 != ((((('#sk3' @ '#sk4') | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4'))) & 0.61/0.85 ((('#sk2' @ '#sk4') | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4'))))))), 0.61/0.85 inference('neg_ext', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain, 0.61/0.85 (( ('#sk3' @ '#sk4') 0.61/0.85 | (((((($false) & ('#sk2' @ '#sk4'))) | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4'))) 0.61/0.85 != ((((($false) | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4'))) & 0.61/0.85 ((('#sk2' @ '#sk4') | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4')))))))), 0.61/0.85 inference('bool_hoist', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain, 0.61/0.85 (( ('#sk3' @ '#sk4') 0.61/0.85 | (('#sk1' @ '#sk4') 0.61/0.85 != ((('#sk1' @ '#sk4') & ((('#sk2' @ '#sk4') | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4')))))))), 0.61/0.85 inference('simplify boolean subterms', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain, 0.61/0.85 (( ('#sk2' @ '#sk4') 0.61/0.85 | ('#sk3' @ '#sk4') 0.61/0.85 | (('#sk1' @ '#sk4') 0.61/0.85 != ((('#sk1' @ '#sk4') & ((($false) | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4')))))))), 0.61/0.85 inference('bool_hoist', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, 0.61/0.85 (( ('#sk2' @ '#sk4') 0.61/0.85 | ('#sk3' @ '#sk4') 0.61/0.85 | (('#sk1' @ '#sk4') != ('#sk1' @ '#sk4')))), 0.61/0.85 inference('simplify boolean subterms', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain, (( ('#sk3' @ '#sk4') | ('#sk2' @ '#sk4'))), 0.61/0.85 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain, 0.61/0.85 (( ('#sk3' @ '#sk4') 0.61/0.85 | (('#sk1' @ '#sk4') 0.61/0.85 != ((('#sk1' @ '#sk4') & ((('#sk2' @ '#sk4') | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4')))))))), 0.61/0.85 inference('simplify boolean subterms', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain, 0.61/0.85 (((('#sk1' @ '#sk4') 0.61/0.85 != ((('#sk1' @ '#sk4') & ((($true) | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4')))))) 0.61/0.85 | ('#sk3' @ '#sk4') 0.61/0.85 | ('#sk3' @ '#sk4'))), 0.61/0.85 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl14, zip_derived_cl9])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain, 0.61/0.85 (( ('#sk3' @ '#sk4') 0.61/0.85 | (('#sk1' @ '#sk4') 0.61/0.85 != ((('#sk1' @ '#sk4') & ((($true) | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4')))))))), 0.61/0.85 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl19])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl24, plain, 0.61/0.85 (( ('#sk3' @ '#sk4') | (('#sk1' @ '#sk4') != ('#sk1' @ '#sk4')))), 0.61/0.85 inference('simplify boolean subterms', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl23])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain, ( ('#sk3' @ '#sk4')), 0.61/0.85 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl24])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain, ( ('#sk3' @ '#sk4')), 0.61/0.85 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl24])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl37, plain, 0.61/0.85 ((((((($true) & ('#sk2' @ '#sk4'))) | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4'))) 0.61/0.85 != ((((($true) | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4'))) & 0.61/0.85 ((('#sk2' @ '#sk4') | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4'))))))), 0.61/0.85 inference('demod', [status(thm)], 0.61/0.85 [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl25])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain, 0.61/0.85 ((((('#sk2' @ '#sk4') | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4'))) 0.61/0.85 != ((('#sk2' @ '#sk4') | ('#sk1' @ '#sk4'))))), 0.61/0.85 inference('simplify boolean subterms', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl37])). 0.61/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl39, plain, ($false), 0.61/0.85 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl38])). 0.61/0.85 0.61/0.85 % SZS output end Refutation 0.61/0.85 0.61/0.85 0.61/0.86 % Terminating... 1.77/0.94 % Runner terminated. 1.77/0.95 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 1.77/0.95 EOF